Nations and Psychology

Nations and National Health

Models of the Nation State that interact with the Individual and Organizational Models can be useful for analyzing different levels of analysis.

Selected Readings and Lectures:

Ishizuka, Nathalie.  “A Trinitarian Model of War and Peace,” Working Paper submitted to Herbert Kelman for his class, Social-Psychological Approaches to International Conflict, Harvard University.

Ishizuka, Y., and Ishizuka N. ” ‘Fear of Closeness’ Underlies Interpersonal as Well as International Conflicts,” Proceedings of World Congress of Psychiatry, Spain, 1996.

“The U.S.-Japan Relationship from a Psychological Perspective” A panel on the U.S. – Japan Relationship, with Prof. Paul R. Krugman and others, Tufts University, Medford, MA (45 minutes)

Ishizuka, Yukio.  “The Japanese Mind: Its Implications for Corporations and Nations”The Institute for Global Business Strategy, Distinguished Lecture Series, Pace University, New York, November 12,1991 (3 hours)

Ishizuka, Yukio.  “The Japanese Mind: Its Implications for the U.S.-Japan Relationship”AT&T Global Business Symposium, with Mr. Clyde Prestowitz and others, Bedminster, NJ, December 12,1991 (1.5 hours)

Copyright © 2010 Lifetrack Corporation

A Need for Models based on Healthy Human Beings

Organizational and International behavior should be based on assumptions about healthy human beings.  Read section a Science of Health (life way), Criteria for Health Models (science of happiness), Happiness Defined? Quantified?  (cycle of life),  Happier? (fear of the unknown),  Why Positive Mental Health Works (objective subjective), and Insights (life purpose).

Visit the Positive Mental Health Foundation to support a study of human beings at their best, happiest, and most creative form.  Link to us to promote health and happiness.

Ready Made Descriptions to Link to Organizational and International Behavior:

Individual Health, Organizational Health, National Health
Applications about healthy human beings to economics, international affairs, nations, organizational behavior.  A new organizational behavior concept or simply a new field of international behavior based on healthy human beings?

Posted in Applications to Other Fields, Positive Mental Health | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nations and Positive Mental Health

Nations

Nations and National Health

Models of the Nation State that interact with the Individual and Organizational Models can be useful for analyzing different levels of analysis.

Selected Readings and Lectures:

Ishizuka, Nathalie.  “A Trinitarian Model of War and Peace,” Working Paper submitted to Herbert Kelman for his class, Social-Psychological Approaches to International Conflict, Harvard University.

Ishizuka, Y., and Ishizuka N. ” ‘Fear of Closeness’ Underlies Interpersonal as Well as International Conflicts,” Proceedings of World Congress of Psychiatry, Spain, 1996.

“The U.S.-Japan Relationship from a Psychological Perspective” A panel on the U.S. – Japan Relationship, with Prof. Paul R. Krugman and others, Tufts University, Medford, MA (45 minutes)

Ishizuka, Yukio.  “The Japanese Mind: Its Implications for Corporations and Nations”The Institute for Global Business Strategy, Distinguished Lecture Series, Pace University, New York, November 12,1991 (3 hours)

Ishizuka, Yukio.  “The Japanese Mind: Its Implications for the U.S.-Japan Relationship”AT&T Global Business Symposium, with Mr. Clyde Prestowitz and others, Bedminster, NJ, December 12,1991 (1.5 hours)

Copyright © 2010 Lifetrack Corporation

A Need for Models based on Healthy Human Beings

Organizational and International behavior should be based on assumptions about healthy human beings.  Read section a Science of Health (life way), Criteria for Health Models (science of happiness), Happiness Defined? Quantified?  (cycle of life),  Happier? (fear of the unknown),  Why Positive Mental Health Works (objective subjective), and Insights (life purpose).

Visit the Positive Mental Health Foundation to support a study of human beings at their best, happiest, and most creative form.  Link to us to promote health and happiness.

Ready Made Descriptions to Link to Organizational and International Behavior:

Individual Health, Organizational Health, National Health
Applications about healthy human beings to economics, international affairs, nations, organizational behavior.  A new organizational behavior concept or simply a new field of international behavior based on healthy human beings?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Organizations and Positive Mental Health

Organizations

Organizations and Organizational Health

Dr. Yukio Ishizuka worked for 4 years at McKinsey (1969-1972) as an Associate on general management consulting.  At McKinsey he admired Marvin Bower his mentor and worked on assignments in Paris, Amsterdam, Toronto, Tokyo and NY offices in a variety of businesses.  Yukio Ishizuka also spent one year at Arthur D. Little as a Consultant (1968-69) on organizational development projects for top management teams for conflict resolution and enhancing creativity.  From 1972-1976 he didmergers and acquisitions for U.S. acquisitions as President and Director of a company financed by Mitsubishi International.

Nathalie Ishizuka studied business, negotiation and international affairs taking classes such as Managing Innovation, and Coordination, Control, and the Management of Organizations at HBS and the winter Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law.  She has an MBA from HEC Paris and a MALD from the Fletcher School of Law & Diplomacy.  After successfully completing the first year of a Ph.D. program in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations at the Haas School of Business, she left academia to pursue her interest in organizations, health, and technology by directly working with innovative firms, including starting her own.  She is grateful to Haas and in particular to Oliver Williamson for helping her understand how new paradigms in organizations are built.

Organizational Model

Based on his understanding of individual personality and health, and his experience working for a variety of companies Dr. Yukio Ishizuka has developed organizational models that integrate with the individual personality model.  They have been used to help CEOs better understand and track a variety of factors that contribute to their organization’s success and excellence.  Dr. Yukio Ishizuka has presented the individual and organizational models to corporations such as AT&T, IBM, and other elite Japanese, American and European CEOs.

Nathalie Ishizuka (MBA) has written a working paper integrating Individual and Organizational Effectiveness: a Systems View integrating Yukio Ishizuka’s model of human personality with Chris Argyris’ model of organization and pushing the two further by defining criteria for Organizational Health models.  In the paper she expands on Yukio Ishizuka’s existing organizational model with a systems view of organizations; integrating the individual model of health with organizational health. In addition to this academic interest, she works with entrepreneurs and new technologies in the creative process of innovation.

Readings, Lectures, More Info on Organizational Health and Excellence

Ishizuka, Yukio.  Lecture: “In Search of Excellence and Well-Being” Presentation of Life-Track to Mr. Ralph Pheifer, Chairman of IBM Asia and Americas and staff to help enhance executive performance. 1985 (2 hours)

Ishizuka, Yukio.  “Individual and Organizational Excellence and Well-Being” Lecture forKeizai Doyu-kai Nagoya Chapter meeting of 200 CEOs and senior executives, 1987 (1.5 hours)

Ishizuka, Yukio, “Facing Structural Challenges: The U.S. and Japan.”  AT&T Global Business Symposium, Phoenix, Arizona, March 26, 1992 (2.5 hours)

Ishizuka, Yukio.  “The Breakdown of Elite Japanese Executives Abroad” Lecture forKeizai Doyu-kai meeting of 200 Japanese CEOs, 1986 (1.5 hours)

Ishizuka, Yukio. “How To Overcome Stress at the Top” Lecture for The Japanese Chemical Manufacturers Club, 50 C.E.O.’s of the Japanese chemical manufacturing companies, September 23, 1997 (1 hour)

Ishizuka, Yukio, “The Japanese Mind: Its Implications for the U.S.-Japan Relationship” AT&T Global Business Symposium, Phoenix, Arizona, March 26, 1992 (2.5 hours)

Ishizuka, Yukio, “Facing Structural Challenges: The U.S. and Japan.”  AT&T Global Business Symposium, Phoenix, Arizona, March 26, 1992 (2.5 hours)

Ishizuka, Yukio. “Excellence and Wellbeing : How to Achieve and Grow Both” Lecture forAnnual Meeting of IFMSA-Japan (International Federation of Medical Student Association-Japan)

Ishizuka, Yukio.  “Happiness and Success : How To Achieve and Grow Both” Lecture forNippon Club of New York, 2007

Ishizuka, Y. and ed. Ishizuka N., “Special Report, How to Help Executives under Stress,”Nikkei Business, September 1992.

Ishizuka, Yukio, “Breakdown of a Japanese Businessman: a Trap for Business Elites,”Voice Magazine, January 1984.

Ishizuka, Yukio, “The Pitfall for Business Elites,” Nikkei Business, the leading Japanese Business Magazine, September 1986.

Ishizuka, Yukio.  “Stress is Your Friend,” Asahi Shinbun International, August 27,1992. A feature interview with Dr. Ishizuka.

Ishizuka, Yukio, “Japan’s Place in the World,” Zaikai-Koron, a Japanese business monthly, 1976.  Among those interviewed by Dr. Ishizuka were Mr. David Rockefeller, Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, Mr. George Ball, former Secretary of State, Mr. Joseph Fravin, CEO of Singer & C., Professor Henry de Bettignies, Director of the Asian Center of INSEAD, and Professor Hugh T. Patrick of Yale University.

Shiroyama, S., The Conditions for Survival. Kodansha: Tokyo, 1991. The book consists of in-depth interviews with eleven individuals from diverse fields. Dr. Ishizuka was interviewed along with the economist Milton Friedman, Andrew Night, editor-in-chief of The Economist, and golfer Jack Nicolas.

“International Front, Japanese Middle Management under Stress,” The New York Times, Sunday March 29,1992. Interview with Dr. Ishizuka.

Casey, E., “A New Computer Tool,” Wall Street Micro News, Oct. 1985.

Lewyn, Mark and Kelly, Erin. “Now, Feedback from Life-Track,” USA Today, September 26,1985.

“Mental Health for an International Businessman,” Mental Health Magazine for Management, March 1984.

Berger, M., “A Japanese Psychiatrist’s Answer to Executive Stress,” International Management, McGraw-Hill, March 1987. An interview with Dr. Yukio Ishizuka introducing Life-Track.

Yogata, M., “Personal Setback and Growth,” Marubeni, December 1985. A personal account documenting the depression and recovery of one of Dr. Ishizuka’s former patients while on assignment in New York. The article celebrates Yogata’s promotion toDirector of leading Japanese corporation.

Costa, P., “The Case of Sad Success,” Gannet Westchester Newspapers, September 11, 1985. A cover-page interview featuring Dr. Ishizuka.

“From Management Consulting to Psychiatric Practice,” Trapedia, May 1982. Interview with Dr. Ishizuka.

“First Encounters,” Business Tokyo, January 1992. Dr. Ishizuka quoted as expert for American businessmen in Japan.

“Japanese Executives Under Stress,” Yomiuri Shinbun, January 12,1986.

Shiroyama, S., Getting Stronger, Overcoming Setbacks. Nippon Keizai Shimbun: Tokyo, 1983. Shiroyama is one of the most prominent authors in Japan. Quotes Dr. Ishizuka extensively.

Woller, B., “When Work is Your World,” Gannet Westchester Newspapers, February 2,1988. Dr. Ishizuka quoted in front-page article.

Woller, B., “When Work is Your World,” Gannet Westchester Newspapers, February 2,1988. Dr. Ishizuka quoted in front-page article.

Copyright © 2010 LifeTrack Corporation

A Need for Models based on Healthy Human Beings

Organizational and International behavior should be based on assumptions about healthy human beings.  Read section a Science of Health (life way), Criteria for Health Models (science of happiness), Happiness Defined? Quantified?  (cycle of life),  Happier? (fear of the unknown),  Why Positive Mental Health Works (objective subjective), and Insights (life purpose).

Visit the Positive Mental Health Foundation to support a study of human beings at their best, happiest, and most creative form.  Link to us to promote health and happiness.

Ready Made Descriptions to Link to Organizational and International Behavior:

Individual Health, Organizational Health, National Health
Applications about healthy human beings to economics, international affairs, nations, organizational behavior.  A new organizational behavior concept or simply a new field of international behavior based on healthy human beings?

 

Posted in Applications to Other Fields | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Applications of Psychology to Organizations, Nations, International Affairs

Applications About Healthy Human Beings to Other Fields?

Behind Science, Simple Assumptions about the Nature of Human Beings

Behind every social science are some fundamental and simple assumptions about the nature of human beings and human personality.  When models of science incorporate assumptions about humans in our optimal most creative form, we can understand better what we are truly capable of, as well as our limits.  Models about healthy human beings can provide new insights into our organizations, and international affairs, forming not only a new individual science, but new organizational models, and a more comprehensive science of international behavior.

All Models of Man are Working Models in Progress

Some of the work on this site applies a healthy assumption about human beings to other fields (for example to the work of the 2009 Nobel Laureate in Economics).  Other work attempts to bring to life conceptual models that can be used as a level of analysis (individualorganizationalnational or international).  At the core of such models are Lifetrack assumptions about healthy human beings.

Naturally, human beings are not organizations or nations.  However, having models that can interact as systems allows us to understand how each unit of analysis influences and impacts the whole.

New Models Based on an Individual Model of Health

In the future, we would enjoy working on such models and applications further, but now our priority is to get one individual model of health and personality known and used on a wider scale by the general public.

Manage with an Understanding of Healthy Human Beings

We encourage politicians, CEOs, and scientists, to think about the assumptions about the nature of man or human personality that underlie a healthy nation, organization or any field of science.

We encourage academics to build models based on an understanding of healthy human beings or models of human personality that can explain man at his best, most creative form as well as in distress. These models should encompass our potential and our limits.

Enjoy Yourself, Join Us

Please join us by opting-in on the newsletter on the website.

Apply assumptions about healthy human beings to your firm, to science, to organizations, nations or international affairs.  If you have a syllabus or other interesting links on the study of healthy human beings and applications to sciences, send it to Nathalie Ishizuka through the contact page. She will find a means to share some of these links, works, or articles on healthy human beings.

Copyright © 2010 Lifetrack Corporation

A Need for Models Based on Healthy Human Beings

Organizational and International behavior should be based on assumptions about healthy human beings.  Read section a Science of Health (life way), Criteria for Health Models (science of happiness), Happiness Defined? Quantified?  (cycle of life),  Happier? (fear of the unknown),  Why Positive Mental Health Works (objective subjective), and Insights (life purpose).

Visit the Positive Mental Health Foundation to support a study of human beings at their best, happiest, and most creative form.  Link to us to promote health and happiness.

Ready Made Descriptions to Link to this Page:

Individual Health, Organizational Health, National Health
Applications about healthy human beings to economics, international affairs, nations, organizational behavior.  A new organizational behavior concept or simply a new field of international behavior based on healthy human beings?

http://positivementalhealthfoundation.com/happiness-and-health/international-behavior/

Posted in Applications to Other Fields, Positive Mental Health | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Life Purpose

Insights

Life Purpose

For those seeking inner well-being (peace, friendliness, physical health, happiness or a sense of mastery) as their life purpose, there seems to be several paths.  Some attempt to find such inner well-being through the Self, others through Intimacyor Achievement.  Still others through Spirituality.  To build and balance inner well-being one may need to be present in all spheres of life.

Self Sphere

Buddha believed that the mind suffers when we dwell upon past misfortunes or future desires.  According to Buddha, the end of suffering lies in complete awareness of the present, bringing the mind to a state of emptiness.   In this sense, Buddha believed the mind has subjective power over external events.  Although we cannot control what happens to us in life, we can control the way in which we respond to it.  We can accept the present moment for what is and in that manner stop suffering from it.  To attempt that, Buddha found that meditation and breathing helped to achieve a state of emptiness or being.  Meditation in this form can be a vehicle for one’s true self (one’s consciousness) to merge with the universe.

Today, many people attempt this, sometimes with the help of Zen or other spiritual teachings.  Through it, one may feel “at peace,” and “in touch” or “in control” apart from what happens in our intimate relationships and achievements.  In this sense, enlightenment through the Self if achieved can be life transforming.  It may be an ideal path for some.  Refreshed and invigorated the Self can then better reach out to others in closeness and in meaningful achievement.

Achievement Sphere

Some of us feel a sense of peace or being when we achieve.  For most, this means when we are at work.  Although not all aspects of work are enjoyable, there are peak moments when we are one with our work.  We lose a sense of time.  During these moments, we experience peace, friendliness, physical well-being, happiness or mastery.

These peak states are not easy to attain, but as most of us expend much time and effort at work (achievement sphere) most have experienced positive peaks of wellbeing during work — or alternatively when we achieve in a passion, hobby or favorite sport (also a form of achievement).

Peak states often do not last long, but when experienced give a sense of quietness.  Those who experience longer lasting states, often experience them when  they move towards a life goal with a sense of lightness that enables them to enjoy the present moment.

Intimacy Sphere

Most of us want to find love above all else.  As adults, we seek such love in a couple relationship, the most intimate union of two human beings emotionally, intellectually and physically sexually.  Because couple intimacy can provide the strongest sense of oneness with another and with the world, we crave it.  When disappointed, hurt or frustrated, the same couple relationship that provided well-being can provoke peaks of anxiety, anger, physical symptoms, depression or psychosis.

Couple intimacy can provide a sense of peace, friendliness, physical well-being, happiness and mastery.  Yet, like achievement, continued wellbeing in intimacy involves our full attention.  To shortcut effort, some seek a sense of one-ness in sex, where he or she may temporally lose a sense of self and become one with the other and the world.  Yet often such intimacy is fleeting.  Unless intimacy is given the attention and work that we often readily give to achievement or to our sense of self, the sense of connection is lost.

Pleasure and Wellbeing are Different

Well-being or states that can encompass moments of peace, friendliness, physical well-being, happiness and mastery are experienced when we are fully present in any one sphere (self, intimacy, achievement).  Yet, states of wellbeing are not to be sought directly or mistaken as mere pleasure (sex, alcohol, etc).  Of course, sex can be pleasurable but sex without intimacy does not sustain a greater sense of well-being.  Alcohol or drugs may make one feel good by temporarily escaping reality, but there is no mastery.  The self may mistakenly feel ‘at peace,’ but is neither ‘in control,’ nor ‘in touch.’ While well-being brings a background or constance to one’s inner state, pleasure is always fleeting.

Well-being (peace, friendliness, physical health, happiness and mastery) can be experienced as we build and balance our sense of self, intimate relationships and achievement at much higher levels than before.  At higher states of wellbeing one still experiences suffering, yet suffering occurs in the background of a larger sense of inner happiness, peace, friendliness, physical wellbeing and mastery.

Resistance in the form of Stress

Regardless of the sphere one approaches or builds inner well-being, one finds resistance.  As one experiences a challenge or pushes beyond a previous best level of adjustment, one will need to overcomestress or fear (anxiety, anger, physical-symptoms, depression or even for some psychosis).  These defenses can be triggered from a difficult past or may be dormant in people who have had positive experiences.

Fear exists in all of us to differing degrees.  Stress surfaces when we push beyond a previous best level of self, intimacy or achievement or when we are overwhelmed with a current challenge.

As we grow, we cannot avoid stress.  Stress is a normal sign that the mind is momentarily overwhelmed.  Either a positive or negative experience can trigger it.  When stressed, we may experience a hierarchy of defense including anxiety, anger, physical symptoms, depression or psychosis.  These are not pleasant states and there are a variety of stress techniques we can use in our daily life to grow from crisis.  Some who hate life itself experience 5 alternatives at his or her threshold of individual stress tolerance.

Building health and happiness is difficult.  When we cannot overcome a challenge, it may be necessary to withdraw from the challenge temporarily.  This allows us to achieve a better perspective.  Once rested, we can return to our life challenge to surpass a previous level of intimacy, self or achievement.   When we feel we can not breakthrough nor withdraw, it is important to reach out to others and when necessary seek professional help.

Spirituality

The Lifetrack model of positive mental health follows the criteria established by Jahodafor robust models of health which can explain the mind at its best and worst.  Such models are demanding in nature, but when adequate can provide insight to individuals in dire distress or at their optimal best.  Perhaps such models should also explain the need for human spirituality.

The Lifetrack model does not espouse any one religion or model of spirituality.  Yet it allows room for them to exist.  To understand the role of spirituality in such a model, one examines how the three spheres inter-act and over-lap to form our personalities.

Each sphere affects all the others.  Outer experience touches the inner and vice-versa.  We do not exist in isolation.  Our self, intimacy and achievement spheres inter-act and influence each other and our experience of the world.  When you have a bad day at work, that influences your relationship.  When your relationship is shaky, that influences your state of mind at work.  When your Self sphere experiences stress (out of touch, not at peace nor in control), your love and work suffers.  Through our senses the outside world influences our inner experience.

Three SpheresNotice, that at the center of the overlap amongst the three spheres is a space.  That center or space can represent inner consciousness.  It embodies our essence that experiences our self, intimacy and achievement spheres.

In other words, some may become aware of this space as they become selfless (the true self becoming one with the universe as in Buddhism), or find and achieve a life task that has an impact on a neighbor or on humanity (meaningful achievement), or experience the love of a spouse, of children, of other human beings, God, nature and the universe (intimacy).  As inner consciousness grows, one might imagine that this inner vortex grows.

Spirituality : An Extension of the Intimacy Sphere

In terms of the Lifetrack model of positive mental health, spirituality is seen as an extension of the intimacy sphere. This is because transcendental love and the love for another human being are not seen as two different quests, but a related one.  That is when we love another human being unconditionally or experience the love of God; each fortifies the experience of the other.  It is as if the door to one, can open the other.

Dr. Ishizuka is himself open to Buddhism, Zen and Christianity. He is agnostic, open to the reality of such existence, without wishing to name one or espouse one over the other.  His work as a therapist remains rooted on the individual and human intimacy.

Because the Lifetrack positive mental health model evolved in the course of working with patients through Dr. Yukio Ishizuka’s work as a psychiatrist, therapy focuses on human relationships, and notably, the most meaningful, inter-dependent and difficult human relationship: the couple.  Although this relationship has the potential for us to experience the greatest joy or ecstasy, it also has the capacity for us to experience the greatest pain.

Dr. Ishizuka teaches a couple to disarm the mutual defenses against closeness (anxiety, anger, physical-symptoms, depression, and psychosis) to breakthrough to a much higher level of intimacy than a couple has ever experienced previously.   A breakthrough in intimacy pervades all areas of one’s life ; including the self and achievement spheres.

Through breakthrough intimacy, Ishizuka helps an individual become and remain closer to an important other person (spouse or equivalent) long after therapy has terminated. This source of unconditional love and happiness in one’s couple relationship (at far higher levels than the individual previously experienced at his or her best), transforms the individual, the couple, and often how they experience their achievement and self spheres.

Interestingly, when one can love another human being such as a spouse or equivalent (love definition), it may also open a door for spirituality.  In the same manner, spiritual intimacy (becoming one with Christ or in Buddhism one with the Universe) also opens the door for greater compassion and love to all human beings.

Cycle of Life and the Growth of Spheres that build Health

Over one’s life one will re-define one’s self, intimacy and achievement spheres.  Through this growth, the circles expand and grow larger.  As an adult, one’s spheres encompass a closer relationship with an important other person such as a spouse or equivalent, with others around us and with the world.

As the spheres expand, the definition of self, intimacy and achievement expands to encompass more of the world.  Many engage in helping a larger cause than oneself, or one’s immediate family.  In this manner, we engage with others and with the world defining our three spheres in a broader sense.

Happiness and Health: Inner Transformation First

The person who wants to change the world (large achievement sphere) but who has not changed himself first, may become overwhelmed.  He or she may outwardly have a large achievement, self or intimacy sphere (and be admired by many), but may not be reaping the full experience of inner peace, friendliness, physical-wellbeing, happiness and mastery which usually accompanies such growth in spheres.

Through effort and self-denial, one can accomplish much (and often be regarded as a genius).  However noble and life changing one’s accomplishments, when one’s achievement remains external, one foregos the present.  Accomplishment gives a sense of joy, friendliness or love — but not for long.  Once one goal is achieved, another larger goal is presented.

Through Breakthrough Intimacy, by becoming far closer to another human being (usually spouse or equivalent), we may experience longer lasting peace, friendliness, physical health, happiness and mastery.  Through a deeper experience of closeness with the most important person in one’s life, we make a fundamental breakthrough in all areas of life and experience longer lasting well-being (peace, friendliness, physical health, happiness and mastery).

In the Lifetrack experience, breakthrough intimacy provides a deep transformation in all spheres of life–including achievement.  It is as if at such higher levels of intimacy, one initiates a transformation process in human personality that is far more profound than any direct work on achievement or superficial work on the Self.

Once breakthrough intimacy is achieved and sustained for a period, the self and achievement spheres rise to meet and balance it at much higher levels of well-being or adjustment.  The breakthrough, initiated in the intimacy sphere, extends to all spheres of life.

The goal of life is to build one’s spheres: to develop a larger sense of self, intimacy and achievement, but with a sense of lightness.

There is no limit to inner growth.  The self at its peak become selfless (the true self becoming one with the universe as in Buddhism).  Achievement (the desire to do something meaningful, well or difficult) impacts not only our neighbor, but potentially humanity. Intimacy, our love for a spouse or equivalent, may encompass children, neighbors, all other human beings, God, nature or the universe.

Inner transformation is possible through any one sphere.  In the context of Lifetrack, the breakthrough point is through the intimacy sphere (couple relationship).  Through this most important and difficult relationship the couple is taught to disarm their defenses (anxiety, anger, physical symptoms, depression and psychosis) that are triggered by rising intimacy.

Other approaches to internal change may attempt to go through the Self (spiritual teachings) or through achievement (aligning one’s inner purpose and outer achievement).

If we grow in all spheres and can do so with playfulness and humor from within (we do not take ourselves too seriously), we may experience true self, intimacy and achievement, and also enjoy each moment.  We can change the world by experiencing change within ourselves.  From this position of inner peace, friendliness, physical wellbeing, happiness and mastery, effective action is strengthened.

As we grow our presence in our self, intimacy and achievement spheres, we can grow to encompass a larger, healthier world.  We incorporate the world in ourselves and experience ourselves in the world.

Copyright © 2010 Lifetrack Corporation

Read our section Happiness and Health, a Science of Health (life way), Criteria for Health Models (science of happiness), Happiness Defined? Quantified?  (cycle of life),  Happier? (fear of the unknown),  Why Positive Mental Health Works (objective subjective), and Applications (international behavior).

Visit http://www.PositiveMentalHealthFoundation.com to understand individuals at their best, happiest, and most creative form.  Link to us to promote health and happiness.

Ready Made Description to Link to this Page:

Life Purpose, Finding Spirituality, Spiritual Living
Life Purpose, love god, spirituality definition, nature spirituality, Zen, Christianity, Buddhism, love definition, work definition, self definition

http://positivementalhealthfoundation.com/happiness-and-health/life-purpose/

Posted in Achievement & Happiness, Children & Happiness, Intimacy & Happiness, Positive Mental Health, Self & Happiness, Spirituality and Happiness | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why it Works

Happiness is a Subjective State of Mind

How a person evaluates and accepts himself or herself is ultimately dependent on that person’s own subjective criteria—not external objective standards.

The subjective factor is the meaningful yardstick in the experience of inner wellbeing, psychological health and optimal adjustment.

The Inner Game & Happiness (objective subjective ?)

One’s sense of happiness and misery has nothing to do with whether other people find they can survive in your impossible job or whether they actually find such challenges intoxicating.  Since it is subjective experience, rather than objectively measurable external elements that contribute to well-being, the only meaningful measure of experience is performed by the very person who experiences states of inner wellbeing.

Who Decides who is Well?

In medicine, the doctor decides if the patient is ill or well.  It is not left up to the patient’s subjective opinion.  If a patient is tested and found to have AIDS, that patient is sick even if in the early stages of the disease the patient may not be suffering from any symptoms.  The patient’s feeling healthy does not discard the objective reality of the presence of a fatal disease.

Blind and Sick, but Happy?

In medicine, an objective approach is the more scientific and reliable of the two.  What may be true about the body, however, may not be accurate about the mind.  If someone is miserable, it doesn’t really matter that a whole panel of psychiatrists “objectively” decide according to some statistical norm that he has an ideal and well-adjusted life.  In the person’s mind his life may be hell and unless he changes it or his perception of it, he will continue to feel miserable.  The reverse is just as true.  If someone is old, blind and sick yet is at peace and content, then it doesn’t matter that a panel of doctors “objectively” decide that he is really miserable, but doesn’t know it.  Whatever the panel concludes will make little difference to one very happy individual.

Why it Works : The Positive Psychology Approach?

One of the founder’s of positive psychology, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi has brought to the forefront ideas on how flow (being in the present) is facilitated.  He mentions the need for clear goals, concentrating and focusing, direct and immediate feedback, balance between ability level and challenge, a sense of personal control, an activity that is intrinsically rewarding, and action awareness merging.  Most of the time flow is experienced through one’s work (because of the sheer amount of time and energy we attribute to it).

In the Lifetrack model, one can also experience and measure wellbeing in the Achievement sphere (see work definition).  Flow or well-being can be experienced in a task, in the self dimension of achievement (the ability to gain satisfaction and self-control) as in one’s interpersonal relationships at work.

Flow is frequently experienced in the achievement sphere, but can be experienced in all spheres of our lives (including self and intimacy) when the right conditions exist.

When we view criteria that help induce states of flow and apply them to the three spheres of our psychological existence, we can better understand why the Lifetrack method works to increase positive mental health in all three spheres.  With focus, clear goals on what determines and contributes to inner health (self, intimacy and achievement), we consciously build spheres of our lives that contribute most to flow and wellbeing.  We experience happiness by building presence in our three spheres.

Direct and Immediate Feedback

When one tracks oneself daily in spheres that contribute to psychological health and well-being, hard numbers put a setback—which frequently look like the end of the earth—into the proper perspective.  The humor and expertise of the therapist may allow him to use information provided by the patient to predict ahead of time unexpected psychological responses to emotions.  He or she helps the individual concentrate and focus on improving areas of health, rather than decreasing symptoms of distress.

A Sense of Personal Control

Subjective self rating in spheres that contribute to health help us learn from mistakes rather than repeat them.  Having people artificially stick a number also reinforces the idea that the subjective is controllable.  It gives us a lever to hold on to and shape.  If you accept your spouse at only a 4 on a 10 point scale means that you could experience a closer relationship.

In sessions, one is actively coached on how one might adjust optimally in each of the parameters of well-being.  Although you might presently accept your spouse at a 4, how might you strive to make that five?  How about a six?  By moving progressively, there is a balance between the ability level and challenge.

Action is Intrinsically Rewarding

Since improvement in the three spheres of our life (self, intimacy and achievement) contribute to our own happiness and wellbeing (peace, friendliness, physical wellbeing, happiness and mastery) our effort is intrinsically rewarding.  Because a greater experience of inner self, intimacy and achievement is the objective of therapy, the self rating exercise is not simply an act of passive mental accounting.  Rather it is an active process in which we must think, feel and act in ways to improve in each of the positive parameters that provide us with a sense of inner well-being and happiness.

When rating oneself, one is encouraged to ask, “How can I think, feel and act in order to make this score go up even further?”  The individual is encouraged to go beyond a previous best level of 10 with therapy ending often within six months at a level of 50 or 60 (or 5 or 6 times beyond a previous optimal level of adjustment).  At this higher level of adjustment in the three spheres, the individual’s sense of peace, friendliness, physical well-being, happiness and sense of mastery also peaks.  Positive peaks of well-being go far beyond a previous best level of experience.

Subjective Rating and the Conscious Choice for Health

According to the Lifetrack approach, health is as an internal state, which is experienced when an individual is fully alive and intimately involved with the world. To experience and maintain psychological health is seen as a conscious choice.  Like athletic skill, building health demands practice, constant attention, and commitment.  It becomes a life way and is applied daily without much thought.

While most may apply themselves to work, with clear goals, concentration and focus at the office, and direct and immediate feedback by peers, these conditions are often not applied to other spheres of our lives (self and intimacy).  The Lifetrack adjustment sheet helps us become conscious of all spheres of existence and their impact on each other, allowing us to focus on key elements of inner wellbeing.  Clear goals in inner wellbeing are defined, quantified and tracked allowing individuals to focus only on the key psychological spheres that contribute to inner well-being or that may give a sense of life purpose.  A therapist or coach may accompany to help the individual overcome initial resistance, and peaks of stress.

Enhancing Health by Focusing on Key Spheres of Life

To enhance an individual’s capacity to build health and well-being daily, Lifetrack has developed a scale that enables us to measure subjective well-being and health in three psychological spheres of existence: self, intimacy and achievement.  A daily self-rating enables people to measure, track and review progress.  The goal is to surpass one’s own previous best sense of happiness or well-being in all three spheres.  By focusing on building health in three critical spheres of life (rather than reducing disease), personal challenges and painful setbacks are transformed into life changing opportunities for growth.

Defining and Quantifying Inner Growth

Individuals commit approximately five minutes a day (some do the exercise 3 times a day) subjectively rating themselves in forty-one elements of human personality and experience.  These elements include satisfaction with self, emotional and sexual closeness with a spouse or lover, and fulfillment at work.  Together, these 41 elements help succinctly capture the three spheres of self, intimacy, and achievement, positive and negative emotions, and physical conditions that contribute to health and happiness.

Feedback, Perspective, Focus on Health

By computer, daily self-assessments are then translated into graphs enabling individuals to view fluctuations in each of their three spheres over time.  This visual feedback helps focus efforts on building health optimally in all spheres of our lives.  A trained therapist who discusses during weekly therapy sessions how to go beyond a previous best can analyze the feedback.  Often the sessions involve a spouse or partner who will remain with the individual long after therapy has terminated.  The process of self-rating and self-assessment is a subjective and reflective exercise encouraging individuals to develop new ways of thinking, feeling, and acting that contribute to their psychological health and happiness.

Awareness of the Cycle of Life and Measuring Happiness

By defining and quantifying experience, people gain the ability to understand, mold and shape the subjective factor—the very inner game—responsible for our sense of misery and happiness.  Dr. Yukio Ishizuka uses self rating to help individuals visualize the changes in his or her psychological adjustment or psyche over time; gaining tremendous insight from the lessons of the past.  Rather than repeating patterns of coping, individuals are encouraged to try new and more effective ways of handling life’s challenges and experiencing optimal health.

Balancing Ability level and Challenge

Naturally, there are limits to using subjective experience as a yardstick to well-being.  A positive mental health approach does not rely solely on just the individual’s perception of his well-being.  In life the input of others and reactions around us influence our perception’s of ourselves.  In therapy, an outside party—the therapist, is constantly following one’s subjective response to events.  By focusing on actively building health, the therapist helps push the individual to grow at a faster rate that he or she may normally undertake.  This may initially provoke stress.

A good sense of humor and an excellent therapist often helps one overcome this initial stage of resistance.  Of course not everyone can move at a rapid pace.  When a patient’s perception of events is so distorted—such as in an acute psychotic condition (where the mind becomes fragmented, disjointed, and otherwise under paralysis) one’s own understanding of well-being may become meaningless.

Limits to the Lifetrack Approach

Like any approach, there are limits to using subjective experience as a yardstick to well-being.  This means that when a patient’s cognitive capacity is impaired as in an acute psychotic condition, chemical, environmental and supportive psychotherapy approaches should be employed before the self-reflection and self-rating exercises in therapy can be helpful.  Yet, the ultimate goal for all is the same: building and balancing a sense of self,intimate relationships and achievement.

The Experience of Well-being

Clear goals, concentration and focus, direct and immediate feedback, balancing the ability level and challenge, a sense of personal control, activity that is intrinsically rewarding may all contribute to the experience of flow or presence (a loss of self-consciousness, a distorted sense of time, a quietness or presence in the moment), but they do not guarantee it.  The experience itself is dependent on the consciousness of the individual at the time he or she focuses on any one sphere of his or her life.

Filling out the Lifetrack total adjustment sheet is a tool to create a mental inventory of elements that contribute to inner wellbeing.  Filling it out helps ‘make conscious’ the elements of inner wellbeing necessary so we can better focus and become present in key areas that contribute to inner health.  When the accounting is not merely passive, but active the individual experiences greater presence in actively growing each of the three spheres of psychological existence (self, intimacy, achievement) to his or her fullest capacity.  Often the experience of flow or inner wellbeing cannot help but follow growth in any one life sphere (see happiness the goal of Lifetrack therapy?).

Copyright © 2010 Lifetrack Corporation

Read our section Health and Happiness, a Science of Health (life way), Criteria for Health Models (science of happiness), Happiness Defined? Quantified? (cycle of life),  Happier? (fear of the unknown), Insights (life purpose), Applications (international behavior).

Visit the Positive Mental Health Foundation to support a study of human beings at their best, happiest, and most creative form.  Link to us to promote health and happiness.

Ready Made Description to Link to this Page :

Objective Subjective, Subjective Objective
Objective subjective, Happiness and Health, Health and Happiness, Why Positive Mental Health Works

http://positivementalhealthfoundation.com/happiness-and-health/objective-subjective/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Happier? Fear of the Unknown?

The need to Quantify the Unquantifiable

Awareness is only the Beginning

In Dr. Yukio Ishizuka’s clinical experience, his patients have shown that to be aware of spheres that contribute to happiness and well-being is not enough.  For an individual to become happier or reach greater growth and development in a short period of time there needs to be a means for them to actively work on these spheres and improve them.  In the experience of Lifetrack, the ability to track over time and improve the subjective world is not an impossibility.  Once one has defined spheres (love definitionwork definitionself definition) that contribute to well-being (peace, friendliness, physical-wellbeing, happiness and mastery); one can quantify or track these qualitative areas.

Putting Numbers on How Sexually Excited you feel?

So how can we put numbers on how sexually excited we are or on how much we accept a spouse without wanting to change him or her?  Patients in Lifetrack therapy do this all the time.  They start with a 10 point scale with 0 as the minimum and 10 as the initial maximum.

Having to artificially stick a number on your thoughts, feelings and actions reinforces the idea that the subjective is controllable.  It gives you a lever to hold on to and shape.  If you depend on your spouse or significant other at only a 5 on a 10 point scale, that implies that you can think, feel and act in ways that allow you to more graciously depend.

Coached to Think Positively and Optimally

In sessions an individual is actively coached on how to improve optimally in each of the parameters.  Although a person might presently accept his wife (without wanting to change her) at a three, how might he strive to make his three a four?  How about a five?  Since improvement is the objective and not the absolute value, it is explained to patients that the self rating exercise is not simply an act of passive accounting.  Rather it is an active process in which an individual must reflect on how he or she can think, feel and act so as to improve daily scores in each of the positive parameters.  When rating oneself, you are encouraged to ask the question, “How can I think, feel and act in order to make this score go up even further?”  This concentrated effort accounts for the rate of growth in a relatively short period of therapy time.

Measuring Rod and Why it Changes with You

We Need a Yardstick that Grows With Us

The yardstick used to measure one’s subjective psychological experience seems to change its length in such a way that the reading is always the same for most individuals.  “One’s best,” is always one’s highest limit. The term, much like the speed of light, is thought of as a constant; the highest attainable limit at any given point in time.  Yet, we need a yardstick that grows with us.

Fear of the Unknown : Allowing Yourself to Count Past Ten

When one translates the term “best” into a number on a 0-10 scale a problem arises. The predicament was pointed out to Dr. Ishizuka many years ago by a patient. As the patient exceeded in certain elements his previous best adjustment, he consistently rated himself at a 10 (the maximum score). Insisting that his 10 today was much higher than the 10 of last week, he felt that his scores were no longer representative of his true experience. It was at this time that Dr. Ishizuka decided that the internal psychological adjustment had no limits. The scale would have to be open-ended to reflect that reality.

Measuring Higher Levels of Health and Adjustment

The 0-10 scale expands as one’s experience surpasses a previous best. To be an accurate gauge of measurement the 0-10 scale was altered to account for such growth. When an individual exceeded that past optimal experience, the measuring rod would grow to enable the measurement of higher levels of adjustment that were previously thought unimaginable (the patient could then rate an 11 and so on). Past maximums could be in this way challenged and replaced by a new maximum.

Happier?  Accepting the Negatives and Increasing Positives

What one is really learning to do through therapy is to accept the inevitable negatives of life and increase the positives.  The definitions and numbers are there as tools.  The real change is not in the definition or the numbers (they are just a means), but in pushing yourself to experience growth in your selfintimacy and achievement spheres.

Copyright © 2010 Lifetrack Corporation

Read the section Happiness and Health, a Science of Health (life way), Criteria for Health Models (science of happiness), Happiness Defined? Quantified? (cycle of life),  Why Positive Mental Health Works (objective subjective), Insights (life purpose), and Applications (international behavior).

Visit the Positive Mental Health Foundation to support a study of human beings at their best, happiest, and most creative form.  Link to us to promote health and happiness.

Ready Made Description to Link to this Page :

Fear of the Unknown, Happier? Measure Happiness
Happier? Subjective Happiness, life questions, self definition, love definition, work definition, measure happiness, track happiness, quantify happiness.

http://positivementalhealthfoundation.com/happiness-and-health/fear-of-the-unknown/

Posted in Achievement & Happiness, Intimacy & Happiness, Positive Mental Health, Self & Happiness | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cycle of Life : Happiness Defined? Quantified??

Empiric Science: Possibilities & Limits Measuring the Cycle of Life

Dr. Yukio Ishizuka’s has applied in the last 30 years the new method of positive mental health to over 2000 patients in private practice (representing 40,000 session hours). He has examined well over a million computer generated graphs of the patient’s daily subjective self-assessment. Based on this information, he has hypothesized the following on the ability and limits of tracking what is going on inside people’s heads:

Insights on Defining and Measuring Happiness:

1. My misery is your heaven, your heaven my hell.

Psychological distress or well-being such as “anxiety,” “peace,” “depression” or “happiness” are essentially subjective experiences that can only be observed and reported by the person who is experiencing them. What makes one person happy might make another miserable and vice-versa. Furthermore, happiness to one person may not be exactly the same thing as happiness reported by another. It may even be different for the same person at a different time. Nevertheless, since the experience of well-being or distress is a subjective internal phenomena, the best expert to measure it is still oneself. There are of course some exceptions. An individual, who is psychotic, may have lost the capacity to reason or a “realistic” perception that makes self-rating a valuable exercise. Individuals who have difficulty in introspection may do less well in this therapy than in others.

2. I see the world through colored glasses and can consciously switch pairs.

My inner state of mind affects what it is I see and experience. To put it in terms of physics, the observed object is not separate from the observer. Since the mind is aware of its own consciousness, it can choose to focus on one thing and selectively ignore another. Depending on what we decide to observe and measure, we may be creating what we look for and find. Hence if individuals observe and measure precisely diseases and disorders, they may be creating them where they might not have otherwise existed. Conversely, if individuals chose to observe and measure “positive mental health” or well-being, they may be able to create it where it may not have otherwise existed!

Naturally, part of being happy is being conscious of it. In this sense, it is clear that the observer may well influence the experience of life by the intention or act of assessing it according to the Lifetrack model. This is an intended effect. Daily self rating oneself attempts to change not only the objectively measurable life experiences but the “unconscious measuring rod” or subjective perception of experience. The scale should serve to help individuals discern that they are getting much happier, rather than believing that there level of happiness is “constant.” Taking such a psychological leap is more than just symbolic. It empowers incremental thinking. In short, the observer may be “creating” what one observes by choosing to observe it.

3. Now I’m happy, now I’m not.

Psychological experience is a quanta and is discontinuous. It occurs in spikes of thoughts, feeling and actions. Happiness and depression are not steady states, but can change from one moment to the next. For this reason, the total adjustment sheet (even one self rating) is really a snapshot of moments. Even with a simple 10 point scale, assessments may be different if the same person performs the exercise only a few minutes later (depending on what happened in the meantime) or what the person might have happened to think about when another self-assessment was being made.

Despite this fundamentally subjective and changeable nature of the self assessments, in the experience of Lifetrack therapy, repetitive self assessments according to the same fixed model yield highly valuable information. To use an analogy, one can imagine that each of the individual ratings are much like a droplet in our psychological experience. These droplets when viewed individually or in isolation may not tell us much. However, when a person uses the same model consistently over time, the droplets accumulate creating patterns, which take the shape of a fountain.

In this sense, one can think of one’s overall psychological state as a fountain, which keeps a certain shape, but consists of constantly changing and discontinuous droplets. While we may not objectively compare the level of happiness of one patient to another (objective subjective), we can compare the level of happiness in the same person at different points in time, particularly if such self assessments are performed frequently and regularly (daily for example.) Although memory is short, one can reliably observe if one is happier or more depressed than the day before.

4. Hold on! One thing at each instant.

If at this very moment I am conscious that I am happy, I cannot be conscious that I am depressed (two seconds later is a different story.) Anything one focuses on takes one’s attention and consciousness away from something else. This phenomenon is similar to the uncertainty principle in physics. That is, in the frontier of the “exact” science of physics, it has now been repeatedly proven by experiments that if one measures exactly the “momentum” of a sub-atomic particle, the same observer cannot know anything about the “position” of the same particle or vice-versa. Hence, by choosing to observe one aspect of nature “exactly,” one must at that instant give up knowing “anything” about some other property of the same object being observed.

If this same principle of “uncertainty” applies to the observation of phenomenon of the human mind, the implication may be fundamental. As far as tracking the mind is concerned, it suggests that when one is doing the self-rating, one cannot think of the “accept” and “depend” element at the very same instant. Hence the model is really a collection of “snapshots” that are arbitrarily pulled together. However, for lack of a better way to capture dynamically changing states of mind this may be a good beginning. Although we can individually see the droplets and patients can attempt to describe their experience at one given point in time, it is only when we see the fountain that we capture personality. The tracking does not provide the totality of the experience, but is a tool during therapy to trigger insights and ask relevant questions.

5. Nirvana cannot be fully captured in words, or digits. So why bother?

The subjective experience of happiness, well-being, depression and the like cannot be adequately or fully described. It can only be experienced by each individual. This raises the inevitable question, “If ‘reality’ of psychological phenomena can only be experienced and not described fully – how can we track it?”

The physicist Finkelstein wrote similarly about how “experience” in the exact science of physics cannot be fully communicated to others (remember Einstein’s analogy about a physicist never being able to see under the watch). He argued that despite that one cannot fully communicate experience to others, if we can show how to make the experience happen and show how to measure it, then we can help others to have it. This is precisely what has been done in Lifetrack therapy.

Evidence and Empiric Data at the Basis of a New Science

The accumulated evidence of daily self-rating data of more than 1,200 patients throughout their treatment on 41 parameters (9 parameters each for the three spheres or a total of 27 total, 5 positive peak emotions, 5 peak negative emotions, 4 for physical health peaks), may constitute the largest database of positive mental health indicators existing.

We are open to future research and work undertaken in coordination with NIMH, academics and others that could be of benefit to the field of positive mental health and psychology.

 

Copyright © 2010 Lifetrack Corporation

Read Health and Happiness, Science of Health (life way), Criteria for Health Models (science of happiness), Happier? (fear of the unknown), Why it works (objective subjective), Insights (life purpose), and Applications (international behavior).

Visit the Positive Mental Health Foundation to support a study of human beings at their best, happiest, and most creative form.  Link to us to promote health and happiness.

Ready Made Description to Link to this Page :

Cycle of Life, Defining Happiness, Measuring Happiness
Psychological adjustment, positive mental health, cycle of life, physics, personality
http://positivementalhealthfoundation.com/happiness-and-health/cycle-of-life/

Posted in Achievement & Happiness, Intimacy & Happiness, Positive Mental Health, Self & Happiness | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Criteria to Evaluate Models of Health

Criteria for Models of Health

(Excerpt from Lifetrack Therapy, by Dr. Yukio Ishizuka published in Psychiatr J. Univ Ottawa, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1988).

“In 1958, M. Jahoda produced a monograph entitled ‘Current Concepts of Positive Mental Health,’ reviewing the then existing literature and research on the subject.  This included contributions to the literature looking at the concept of Mental Health, Normality, Happiness and Self-Actualization.  Based on her extensive review, she offered six conditions for evaluating the criteria of Positive Mental Health:

  1. The idea that there can be one single criterion of Positive Mental Health should be abandoned.  Good mental health cannot be reduced to one simple concept and a single aspect of behavior is not an adequate indicator.
  2. As the terms we use to describe mental health have tended to be abstract, we should now strive to more scientifically define our operating procedures and methodologies.  There is a need to have scales and measures for each criterion.
  3. Each of the criteria should be thought of as a continuum since there are unhealthy trends for an otherwise healthy person.
  4. These criteria should, at any point in the individual’s progress, serve either to define the state of the individual, or to indicate trends towards wellness or disease.  Implicit in the criteria is the concept of gradients of mental health.
  5. The criteria are regarded as relatively enduring attributes of a person—not just functions of isolated situations the individual finds himself in at a given time.
  6. The criteria are intended as indicators of the optimum of mental health.  They are not to be regarded as absolutes—and the minimum standard for any individual to achieve has yet to be determined, and may indeed change with age.  Each person has his own limits, and no one reaches the optimum in all criteria.  Still, we assume that most people can achieve the optimum.

Positive Mental Health

The following six criteria were offered by Jahoda as empirical indicators, or a sort of recipe, for Positive Mental Health:

1.     Positive attitudes toward the self.
2.     Growth, development, and self-actualization—including utilization of abilities, future orientation, concern with work, and so on.
3.     Integration, as in a balance of psychic forces, the unifying of one’s outlook, and resistance to stress and frustration.
4.     Autonomy, as in self-determination, independent behavior, and, when appropriate, non-conformity.
5.     A true perception of reality.
6.     Environmental mastery, meaning adequacy in love, work and play, adaptation and adjustment, and the capacity to solve problems.

Little Followed Jahoda’s Work

Twenty years later, H.R. Spiro, in 1980, in his review of the evolution of concept of Positive Mental Health, observed that regrettably little investigations followed Jahoda’s work during the ensuing decades, citing only several related contributions:

Life Satisfaction

‘Cambell examined responses to a series of questionnaires intended to evaluate positive affect, life satisfaction and perceived stress.  Bradburn, Andrews, Withley, all attempted to develop scales that measure social indicators of psychological well-being.’

‘Cambell’s initial results suggested that factors in a life cycle explain much of the variance in the index of positive affect and life satisfaction scales.  Positive affect and life satisfaction scales vary together with the most positive results appearing among married persons with children six years of age and older.  Responses are far more negative for divorced and separated persons.  Positive affect shows the lowest scores among the widowed, the divorced, the separated, and young people who are not married.  The results seem to indicate that family status is the most important single variable in Positive Mental Health.  Occupation, education, religion, race and sex contribute very little to the variance.’

Survey of Happiness

In 1980, a survey of a large number of Americans on happiness conducted by Friedman produced similar findings to those of Campbell.  Friedman reported that the single most important predictor of happiness was the presence of a loving close relationship with someone, followed by satisfaction at work.  Friedman also found that the objective level of success, wealth, independence, and freedom had little predictive value of happiness of the individual, why more subjective elements, such as a sense of confidence in his life values, sense of purposefulness and meaning in his life, and sense of mastery of his fate etc., were more important determinants of one’s happiness.

Lifetrack Model of Positive Mental Health

Building on the above and other concepts of Positive Mental Health, integrating various therapeutic schools of thought, but most importantly learning from the patients in his private practice, Dr. Yukio Ishizuka developed a structured model of Positive Mental Health, that has led to the development of Lifetrack therapy, the role of breakthrough intimacy in changing the structure of personality, a better understanding of happiness (goal happiness ?), and an interesting perspective on the functioning of a healthy and happy mind (life purpose).

Most Stressful Life Events and Insights

In way of developing a working concept of Positive Mental Health, Ishizuka points out it is also helpful to remember the well-known Social Readjustment Scale, developed by Holmes and Ray.  Their 43 stressful life events can be categorized into the following three spheres:  Intimacy (death of a spouse, divorce, marital separation, death in family, marriage, marital reconciliation, etc., 21 items), Achievement (21 items), and Self (7 items).  When the weight given to each event on their 100 point scale, are added, Intimacy sphere receives 50% of the total points, Achievement 40%, and Self 10%.

Spheres of Health: Self (self definition, Intimacy (love definition) and Achievement (work definition)

These three spheres are partly converged on each other and are dynamically interactive with one another.  Building on the above, and other concepts of Positive Mental Health, integrating various therapeutic schools of thought but, most importantly, learning from the patients in his private practice, whose clinical condition must be continuously monitored at least daily, Ishizuka has developed a structured model of Positive Mental Health, in which Self, Intimacy, and Achievement spheres are further defined in three dimensions and nine elements each, meeting all six conditions of criteria for Positive Mental Health proposed by Jahoda, in 1958.”

(Excerpt from Lifetrack Therapy, by Dr. Yukio Ishizuka published in Psychiatr J. Univ Ottawa, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1988).  To download the full journal article (3MB) press lifetrack therapy).

Copyright © 2010 Lifetrack Corporation

Read our section Happiness and Health, Science of Health (life way), Happiness Defined? Quantified?  (cycle of life),  Happier? (fear of the unknown),  Why Positive Mental Health Works (objective subjective), Insights (life purpose), and Applications (international behavior).

Visit the Positive Mental Health Foundation to support a study of human beings at their best, happiest, and most creative form.  Link to us to promote health and happiness.

Ready Made Description to Link to this Page:

Science of Happiness, Jahoda, Criteria for Health Models
Positive mental health criteria, Jahoda ideal mental health, mental health, normality, happiness, self-actualization, lifetrack, love definition, work definition, self definition.

http://positivementalhealthfoundation.com/happiness-and-health/science-of-happiness/

Posted in Achievement & Happiness, Intimacy & Happiness, Positive Mental Health, Self & Happiness | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Life Way

A Science of Happiness and Health

The species “man,” can be defined not only in anatomical and physiological terms; its members share basic psychic qualities, the laws which govern their mental and emotional functioning, and the aims for a satisfactory solution of the problem of human existence.

It is true that our knowledge of man is still so incomplete that we cannot yet give a satisfactory definition of man in a psychological sense.  It is the task of the “science of man” to arrive eventually at a correct description of what deserves to be called human nature. — Erich Fromm (the Sane Society)

Thinking the Unthinkable : A refreshing life way

Can there really be a “science of man”?  How are we to know if psychic qualities really exist?  And, if they do, how might one come to know their nature – let alone how such psychic qualities are related and interact?

The Answer Not Freud (Freud psychoanalysis), but Einstein

Interestingly, the answer to this question may not come from Freud, but Einstein.  He wrote, “In our endeavor to understand reality we are somewhat like a man trying to understand the mechanism of a closed watch.  He sees the face and the moving hands, even hears it’s ticking, but he has no way of opening the case.  If he is ingenious, he may form some picture of a mechanism for all the things he observes, but he may never be quite sure his picture is the only one, which could explain his observations.  He will never be able to compare his picture with the mechanism and he cannot even imagine the possibility and meaning of such comparison.”

How We Make Sense of Reality

Einstein, by sharing this story of the watch, was describing the way the natural science of physics makes sense of reality.

He was well aware that despite that physicists may never discover exactly what was underneath the watch, there were still means to come closer to understanding it.

His predecessor, Newton, had done precisely that.  After stating a few postulates that most of the scientists in his time accepted, Newton attempted to show how the postulates could explain many of the things they observed.  To do so, however, he first had to define what it was he wanted to selectively observe or explain, and find a means or method to measure it (the latter was done by creating calculus).

A Science of Man

In much the same way as physicists must grapple with understanding what is under the watch without being able to see it, the challenge with developing a natural “science of man” could be the same.  The first step then is to do what physics and all natural sciences must courageously attempt: describe general phenomena, concepts or abstractions, which explain a wide variety of experiences.  In the case of a science of man those general concepts concern human psychological experience. This endeavor is likely to be a more difficult task than physics!

What are the Spheres of Psychological Existence?

While all attempts to understand the mind are imperfect, if one begins in the tradition of the natural sciences one must start by describing psychological phenomena that are abstract (and encompassing enough) that they hold true for most psychological experience.  These postulates need to encompass psychic qualities that when present determine the experience of well-being and health or when absent distress and illness.  If indeed there were such core psychic qualities, the laws of “which govern our mental and emotional functioning,” then it would follow that when we move in accordance with those laws well-being is the result.

Can the Same Spheres define health and illness?

Forces, including self-defeating thoughts, feelings and actions, can help us understand the causes of non-organic disease.  Naturally, assuming the very existence of psychological laws or of a better understanding of the structure of the human mind is to think the unthinkable.  Yet, no science is exempt from thinking the unthinkable – of asking of itself the very simple questions that only children dare ask.  These are the most dangerous questions, the ones that can shake the very foundations of any science.

Do the same assumptions hold for the body and mind?

Today, psychiatrists and psychologists need to be asking those questions.  As of yet, the medical field has focused its attention on developing a fairly consistent and increasingly accurate means to classify and measure illnesses, disease and disorders.  In this science of disease, mental illness is analogous to physical illness.  Whether one has cancer or depression, successful treatment demands the elimination of the disease, its reduction or containment.  To be healthy is not to be sick.

The Limits of a Medical Model based on the Body

This “medical model” has been helpful, yet it has a built-in limitation: it cannot explain the mind at its most healthy, creative and fullest potential.  In that sense it can not qualify as a natural science of man.  Too eager to establish a study of the mind as a science, psychiatrists never wondered whether the same assumptions hold for the body and mind.  To use Einstein’s analogy, while surgery, allowed the doctor to open up “the watch” and see whether they were right or wrong about what makes it tick, a science of the mind could not.  Psychiatrists had no idea if whether they were on the right track.  Although psychiatry has come a long way and helped many people, perhaps it should have evolved even further.

DSM useful, but too narrow to understand the Mind

Although pharmacological research has given the medical field increasingly effective and safer medications such as Prozac, the disease model has failed to prove that specific chemical changes in the brain is the cause or the cure for all mental illnesses.  What the field has now is a classification for disease that is helpful for the disbursement of medication, the labeling of “illnesses’” and insurance purposes.

The Death of the Disease Model?

Today this science based on disease is dying — not because it is wrong — but because it presents too narrow a worldview.  It does not attempt to do what all the natural sciences must: describe general phenomena, concepts or abstractions, which explain a wide variety of (human psychological) experiences.  To do so one must return to the challenge offered by Jahoda to develop a model of Positive Mental Health.

The Lifetrack model of positive mental health described on this website is one such attempt (insights Lifetrack), but is certainly not the only model possible.  In this respect, all models are imperfect and wait further testing (objective subjective) by patients to be refined and improved.

Visit the Positive Mental Health Foundation to support a study of human beings at their best, happiest, and most creative form.  Link to us to promote health and happiness.

Copyright © 2010 Lifetrack Corporation

Read our section Happiness and Health, Criteria for Health Models (science of happiness), Happiness Defined? Quantified?  (cycle of life),  Happier? (fear of the unknown),  Why Positive Mental Health Works (objective subjective), Insights (life purpose), and Applications (international behavior).

Ready Made Description to link to this Page:

Health: A Refreshing Life Way
Health and happiness, nature of man or life way, science of health, love definition, self definition, work definition as psychological spheres of existence.
http://positivementalhealthfoundation.com/happiness-and-health/life-way/

Posted in Achievement & Happiness, Children & Happiness, Intimacy & Happiness, Positive Mental Health, Self & Happiness | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment